Recap vs TCU (Licitante Inidôn… — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Recap vs TCU (Licitante Inidôneo)
In-depth architectural comparison of the Recap and TCU (Licitante Inidôneo) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Recap
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
TCU (Licitante Inidôneo)
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Recap if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose TCU (Licitante Inidôneo) if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
R
Choose Recap when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Recap is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, TCU (Licitante Inidôneo) belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Recap when you need capabilities focused on legal and TCU (Licitante Inidôneo) when you require tools for legal.