Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Recap vs Federal Civil
In-depth architectural comparison of the Recap and Federal Civil MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Recap
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Federal Civil
Legal · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Recap if you need specialized Legal tools running via a local process. Choose Federal Civil if your workspace requires Legal integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
R
Choose Recap when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
F
Choose Federal Civil when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Recap Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Federal Civil Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Recap Configuration
Federal Civil Configuration