Reachpad MCP vs Thing

In-depth architectural comparison of the Reachpad MCP and Thing MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Reachpad MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: expose_port, REACHPAD_API_KEY.

Explore Reachpad MCP Details

T

Choose Thing when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Thing Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Reachpad MCP Developer Tools	T Thing Developer Tools
Summary	Durable cloud environments any coding agent can call: run commands, fork, resume.	Artifacts for any coding agent: a durable link with versions, diffs, and comments on the page.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reachpad-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@reachpad/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thing": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@unravel-tech/thing"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons