Raycast vs Revit

In-depth architectural comparison of the Raycast and Revit MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Raycast when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Raycast Details

R

Choose Revit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: revit_upload, revit_get_elements, revit_get_parameters.

Explore Revit Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Raycast Developer Tools	R Revit Developer Tools
Summary	Raycast workflow automation MCP server with 9 tools	Revit model query + APS Design Automation runner.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "raycast": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "raycast-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "revit": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/status-live-brightgreen)](https://revit-mcp.itmartin24.workers.dev/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons