In-depth architectural comparison of the Raw SQL MCP and PlanetScale MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Raw SQL MCP
Databases · Local stdio
Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
PlanetScale
Databases · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Raw SQL MCP if you need specialized Databases tools running via a local process. Choose PlanetScale if your workspace requires Databases integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Raw SQL MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Raw SQL MCP is categorized under Databases and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, PlanetScale belongs to Databases using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Raw SQL MCP when you need capabilities focused on databases and PlanetScale when you require tools for databases.