Rail Score vs Aegis

A side-by-side look at the Rail Score and Aegis MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.

Rail Score logoRail ScoreSecurity · Remote HTTP/SSEResponsible-AI guardrails for agents: scoring, prompt-injection & PII detection, DPDP compliance.43FairAuth: not declaredAegis logoAegisSecurity · Local subprocess (stdio)Credential isolation proxy for AI agents. Injects secrets at the network boundary with domain restrictions, agent authentication, and audit logging. No SDK required — works as a transparent HTTP proxy or MCP server.53GoodAuth: not declared

Verdict: choose Rail Score for security work over a hosted endpoint; choose Aegis for security as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.

Which MCP server should you choose?

Rail Score logoChoose Rail Score when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
  • You prefer a remote HTTP/SSE transport.
  • You want tools like rail_evaluate, rail_check_compliance, rail_detect_injection.
Explore Rail Score

Aegis logoChoose Aegis when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Explore Aegis

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

SpecRail Score logoRail ScoreAegis logoAegis
CategorySecuritySecurity
Quality signal43/100 · Fair53/100 · Good
Install commandConfirmedConfirmed
TransportRemote HTTP/SSELocal subprocess (stdio)
AuthNot declaredNot declared
PricingNot declaredNot declared
Required env varsNone listedNone listed
Verified ownerCommunity listingCommunity listing
GitHub stars014
Directory activity 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes 2 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
Tools9Not listed

Tools & capabilities

Rail Score tools 9

  • rail_evaluateScore content across the 8 RAIL dimensions (optional `policy` enforcement)
  • rail_check_complianceCheck against gdpr, ccpa, hipaa, eu_ai_act, india_dpdp, india_ai_gov
  • rail_detect_injectionDetect prompt injection in untrusted text
  • rail_evaluate_tool_callAllow/warn/block a tool call before it runs
  • rail_scan_tool_resultScan a tool's output for PII + injection, return redacted text
  • rail_safe_regenerateIteratively regenerate content until it passes (slow)
  • rail_dpdp_scanScan for Indian personal data under the DPDP Act 2023
  • rail_dpdp_gateReal-time DPDP processing gate (allow/block/require_action)
  • rail_dpdp_complianceDPDP workflow: emit, require, evidence, session, timers

Aegis tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

Rail Score

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rail-score": {
      "url": "https://mcp.responsibleailabs.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Aegis

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "getaegis-aegis": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@getaegis/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently asked questions

Rail Score is categorized under Security and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Aegis belongs to Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Rail Score for security work and Aegis for security.

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.

Rail Score has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Aegis has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add rail-score and getaegis-aegis as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

On AllMCPs, Rail Score has a quality signal of 43/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Aegis has 53/100 (Good) with 2 views, 0 installs and 14 GitHub stars.