A side-by-side look at the Quillm and Project Context MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Quillm for developer tools work over a hosted endpoint; choose Project Context MCP for developer tools as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Q
Choose Quillm when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Project Context MCP tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Quillm is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Project Context MCP belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Quillm for developer tools work and Project Context MCP for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Quillm has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Project Context MCP is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add quillm and ericbrown-project-context-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Quillm has a quality signal of 40/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Project Context MCP has 51/100 (Good) with 3 views, 0 installs and 6 GitHub stars.