What is the key difference between Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use?

Quash — Mobile App Automation belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution, while Browser Use belongs to the Browser Automation category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Quash — Mobile App Automation or Browser Use in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use free or paid?

Quash — Mobile App Automation operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Browser Use operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Quash — Mobile App Automation lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Browser Use lists 0 tools with 0 views and 108,650 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Quash — Mobile App Automation or Browser Use in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use free to use, or do they require API keys?

Quash — Mobile App Automation is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Browser Use operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both quash-mobile-app-automation and browser-use as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Quash — Mobile App Automation has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Browser Use holds a Quality Score of 53 /100 ( Good ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 108,650 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Quash — Mobile App Automation vs Browser Use

In-depth architectural comparison of the Quash — Mobile App Automation and Browser Use MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Quash — Mobile App Automation

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Browser Use

Browser Automation · Local stdio

Quality: 53/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Quash — Mobile App Automation if you need specialized Browser Automation tools running via a local process. Choose Browser Use if your workspace requires Browser Automation integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Quash — Mobile App Automation when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Quash — Mobile App Automation Details

Choose Browser Use when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Browser Use Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Q Quash — Mobile App Automation Browser Automation	Browser Use Browser Automation
Summary	Drive Android & iOS mobile-app automation from your AI agent on locally connected devices.	Control a real Chrome browser to complete any task: fill forms, extract data, book flights.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Quash — Mobile App Automation Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Browser Use Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Quash — Mobile App Automation Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quash-mobile-app-automation": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "quash-mobile-app-automation"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Browser Use Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "browser-use": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "browser-use"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Quash — Mobile App Automation is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Browser Use belongs to Browser Automation using local stdio subprocess. Select Quash — Mobile App Automation when you need capabilities focused on browser automation and Browser Use when you require tools for browser automation.

More alternatives to Quash — Mobile App Automation More alternatives to Browser Use Browser Automation category hub Canonical compare URL