What is the key difference between Docker MCP and Ziplark?

Docker MCP belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Ziplark belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Docker MCP or Ziplark in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Docker MCP and Ziplark free or paid?

Docker MCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Ziplark operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Docker MCP lists 4 tools with 3 views and 503 GitHub stars. Ziplark lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Docker MCP and Ziplark together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Docker MCP vs Ziplark

In-depth architectural comparison of the Docker MCP and Ziplark MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Docker MCP

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 47/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Ziplark

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Docker MCP if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Ziplark if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Docker MCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Create standalone containers, Deploy Docker Compose stacks, Retrieve container logs.

Explore Docker MCP Details

Choose Ziplark when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ziplark Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Docker MCP QuantGeekDev Developer Tools	Z Ziplark Developer Tools
Summary	Docker container management and operations through MCP	Archive server: extract & create ZIP, 7z, tar, gz/xz/zst; read RAR/RAR5 & ISO. AES-256, safe.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Docker MCP Tools (4)

Create standalone containers

Deploy Docker Compose stacks

Retrieve container logs

List containers and statuses

Ziplark Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Docker MCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quantgeekdev-docker-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "docker-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Ziplark Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ziplark": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ziplark"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Docker MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Ziplark belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Docker MCP when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Ziplark when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Docker MCP More alternatives to Ziplark Developer Tools category hub