Coincap MCP vs Shiwake MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Coincap MCP and Shiwake MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Coincap MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Bitcoin-specific price lookup, Price lookup for supported cryptocurrencies, CoinCap asset listing.

Explore Coincap MCP Details

S

Choose Shiwake MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Shiwake MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Coincap MCP QuantGeekDev Finance & Fintech	S Shiwake MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Real-time cryptocurrency market data integration using CoinCap's public API, providing access to crypto prices and market information without API keys	Journal entry testing (JET) for accounting audits. 11 screening rules, zero dependencies.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "quantgeekdev-coincap-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "coincap-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "shiwake-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shiwake-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons