QR for Agent vs Cargovox

In-depth architectural comparison of the QR for Agent and Cargovox MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose QR for Agent when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QR for Agent Details

C

Choose Cargovox when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cargovox Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	QR for Agent Developer Tools	C Cargovox Developer Tools
Summary	Dynamic QR codes for AI agents — custom styling, scan tracking, webhooks	CargoVox freight tracking and shipment info via AI agents
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "qr-for-agent": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "qr-for-agent"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-255": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-255"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons