MCP Security Audit vs Vitals Vault

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Security Audit and Vitals Vault MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Security Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Remote npm registry security checks, Critical-to-low severity reporting, CVE, CVSS, CWE, and advisory references.

Explore MCP Security Audit Details

V

Choose Vitals Vault when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Vitals Vault Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Security Audit qianniuspace Security	V Vitals Vault Security
Summary	A powerful MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server that audits npm package dependencies for security vulnerabilities. Built with remote npm registry integration for real-time security checks.	Find public biomarker education, available blood tests, panels, and budget-aware starting points.
Category & Scope	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "qianniuspace-mcp-security-audit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vitals-vault": {
      "url": "https://www.vitalsvault.com/developers/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons