PyreCrawl vs Webbersites X402 MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the PyreCrawl and Webbersites X402 MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PyreCrawl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PyreCrawl Details

Choose Webbersites X402 MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Webbersites X402 MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PyreCrawl Search & Data Extraction	Webbersites X402 MCP Search & Data Extraction
Summary	One tool for AI agents to scrape, crawl, extract, map, and search the web. Self-hosted, no API keys.	31 pay-per-call AI agent tools: document extraction, SEO audits, scraping & more. USDC via x402.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pyrecrawl": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "pyrecrawl@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "webbersites-x402-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "webbersites-x402-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons