Pylos MCP vs MAILTYPE — Email Domain Capability Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the Pylos MCP and MAILTYPE — Email Domain Capability Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Pylos MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pylos MCP Details

Choose MAILTYPE — Email Domain Capability Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MAILTYPE — Email Domain Capability Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Pylos MCP Communication	MAILTYPE — Email Domain Capability Intelligence Communication
Summary	Read-focused, prompt-injection-hardened email MCP server for any IMAP provider	Email-domain intelligence: MX capability, provider, disposable status, SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pylos-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "pylos-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mailtype-email-domain-capability-intelligence": {
      "url": "https://mailtype-api.onrender.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons