Putput MCP vs Easysend

In-depth architectural comparison of the Putput MCP and Easysend MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Putput MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: upload_file, list_files, delete_file.

Explore Putput MCP Details

Choose Easysend when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: upload_files, get_bundle, download_file.

Explore Easysend Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Putput MCP Developer Tools	Easysend Developer Tools
Summary	File uploads for AI agents. Upload, list, and manage files. No signup required.	EasySend file sharing MCP server - upload, download and share files. No authentication required.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "putput-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@putput/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "easysend": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "easysend-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons