Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Publish vs Velven
In-depth architectural comparison of the Publish and Velven MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Publish
Gaming · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Velven
Gaming · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Publish if you need specialized Gaming tools running via a local process. Choose Velven if your workspace requires Gaming integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Publish when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
V
Choose Velven when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Publish Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Velven Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Publish Configuration
Velven Configuration