Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Publish vs Summoned Games
In-depth architectural comparison of the Publish and Summoned Games MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Publish
Gaming · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Summoned Games
Gaming · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Publish if you need specialized Gaming tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Summoned Games if your workspace requires Gaming integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Publish when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Summoned Games when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Publish Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Summoned Games Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Publish Configuration
Summoned Games Configuration