Proxy AIops vs VMware AVI

In-depth architectural comparison of the Proxy AIops and VMware AVI MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Proxy AIops when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Proxy AIops Details

Choose VMware AVI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore VMware AVI Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Proxy AIops Cloud Platforms	VMware AVI Cloud Platforms
Summary	Governed Traefik + Caddy + HAProxy ops: routes, upstreams, certs, 5xx RCA. 26 tools.	VMware AVI (NSX ALB) load balancer plus AKO Kubernetes ops — 28 MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proxy-aiops": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from",
        "proxy-aiops",
        "proxy-aiops-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vmware-avi": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from",
        "vmware-avi",
        "vmware-avi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons