ProofSlip vs RealAgent MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the ProofSlip and RealAgent MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ProofSlip when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ProofSlip Details

Choose RealAgent MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore RealAgent MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ProofSlip Developer Tools	RealAgent MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Receipt-based verification for AI agent workflows — create, verify, and poll ephemeral proof objects	AI agent real-name identity: SM2 keypair, QR real-name link, SD-JWT VP generate/verify.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proofslip": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "realagent-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "realagent-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons