What is the key difference between ProofFlow and Helixar Security?

ProofFlow belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Helixar Security belongs to the Security category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install ProofFlow or Helixar Security in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are ProofFlow and Helixar Security free or paid?

ProofFlow operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Helixar Security operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

ProofFlow lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Helixar Security lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both ProofFlow and Helixar Security together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install ProofFlow or Helixar Security in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are ProofFlow and Helixar Security free to use, or do they require API keys?

ProofFlow is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Helixar Security operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both ProofFlow and Helixar Security at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both proofflow and helixar-security as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, ProofFlow has a Quality Score of 33 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Helixar Security holds a Quality Score of 40 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

ProofFlow vs Helixar Security

In-depth architectural comparison of the ProofFlow and Helixar Security MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

ProofFlow

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Helixar Security

Security · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose ProofFlow if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Helixar Security if your workspace requires Security integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ProofFlow when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ProofFlow Details

Choose Helixar Security when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Helixar Security Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P ProofFlow Security	Helixar Security Security
Summary	Audit infrastructure for AI coding agents with evidence-backed review and policy gates.	Security tools for AI agents: scan MCP servers, validate HDP delegation chains, audit releases.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

ProofFlow Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Helixar Security Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

ProofFlow Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proofflow": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "proofflow-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Helixar Security Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "helixar-security": {
      "url": "https://mcp.helixar.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

ProofFlow is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Helixar Security belongs to Security using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select ProofFlow when you need capabilities focused on security and Helixar Security when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to ProofFlow More alternatives to Helixar Security Security category hub Canonical compare URL

Related MCP Server Comparisons

Popular comparisons with ProofFlow

Popular comparisons with Helixar Security

M
Helixar Security vs Mcp Bastion