Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio vs Celigo

In-depth architectural comparison of the Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio and Celigo MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio Details

Choose Celigo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Celigo Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Power Automate MCP Server by Flow Studio Developer Tools	Celigo Developer Tools
Summary	Debug, build, and manage Power Automate cloud flows with AI agents	Manage your Celigo integrator.io account: integrations, flows, connections, errors, and jobs.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "power-automate-mcp-server-by-flow-studio": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "celigo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons