Postnext vs LinkedMash

In-depth architectural comparison of the Postnext and LinkedMash MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Postnext when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Postnext Details

Choose LinkedMash when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore LinkedMash Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Postnext Social Media	LinkedMash Social Media
Summary	Schedule, publish and track posts on X, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Threads and Bluesky.	Search, label and export your LinkedIn saved posts, then draft, schedule and publish from them.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postnext": {
      "url": "https://postnext.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "linkedmash-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@linkedmash/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons