PostHog MCP Server vs Openmetadata

In-depth architectural comparison of the PostHog MCP Server and Openmetadata MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PostHog MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PostHog MCP Server Details

Choose Openmetadata when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Openmetadata Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PostHog MCP Server Data Platforms	Openmetadata Data Platforms
Summary	Official PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.	OpenMetadata MCP — metadata, lineage, search, data quality, OM 1.12+ Data Contracts
Category & Scope	Data Platforms	Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "posthog-mcp-server": {
      "url": "https://posthog.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openmetadata-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@us-all/openmetadata-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons