PostgreSQL MCP Server vs Dryrun

In-depth architectural comparison of the PostgreSQL MCP Server and Dryrun MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PostgreSQL MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PostgreSQL MCP Server Details

Choose Dryrun when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dryrun Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PostgreSQL MCP Server Databases	Dryrun Databases
Summary	PostgreSQL MCP server with 203 tools, connection pooling, HTTP/SSE, OAuth 2.1, and tool filtering	PostgreSQL schema intelligence from a committed snapshot. No connection, no credentials.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "postgresql-mcp-server-3": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "postgresql-mcp-server-3"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dryrun": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@boringsql/dryrun"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons