Portkey Admin Mcp vs Wikipedia Trends API

In-depth architectural comparison of the Portkey Admin Mcp and Wikipedia Trends API MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Portkey Admin Mcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Portkey Admin Mcp Details

Choose Wikipedia Trends API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Wikipedia Trends API Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Portkey Admin Mcp Developer Tools	Wikipedia Trends API Developer Tools
Summary	Full Portkey Admin API MCP server — configs, prompts, keys, analytics, and more.	Wikipedia page view trends for any topic over time. Free key at trendsapi.ai
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "portkey-admin-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "portkey-admin-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "wikipedia-trends-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote",
        "https://api.trendsapi.ai/mcp",
        "--header",
        "Authorization:${AUTH_HEADER}"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons