Portfolio MCP Server vs Unleash MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Portfolio MCP Server and Unleash MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Portfolio MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_projects, get_flagship_project, get_resume_summary.

Explore Portfolio MCP Server Details

Choose Unleash MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: create_flag, evaluate_change, detect_flag.

Explore Unleash MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Portfolio MCP Server Developer Tools	Unleash MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server exposing Ayush Tomar's AI portfolio -- ask what he built or his flagship project.	MCP server for managing Unleash feature flags
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "portfolio-mcp-server": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "portfolio-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unleash-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@unleash/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons