Port Scanner API vs Amazon Ads MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Port Scanner API and Amazon Ads MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Port Scanner API when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Port Scanner API Details

Choose Amazon Ads MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Amazon Ads MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Port Scanner API Developer Tools	Amazon Ads MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Scan the open TCP ports of your own public IP. Fast (32) or deep (65535). No key, no signup.	Amazon Ads API MCP server for Amazon Advertising API
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "port-scanner-api": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "port-scanner-api"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "amazon-ads-mcp": {
      "url": "http://localhost:9080/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons