Playwrightselectorguard MCP vs Browser Gateway

In-depth architectural comparison of the Playwrightselectorguard MCP and Browser Gateway MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Playwrightselectorguard MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: check_selector_risk, suggest_selector_healing, record_action_receipt.

Explore Playwrightselectorguard MCP Details

Choose Browser Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Browser Gateway Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Playwrightselectorguard MCP Browser Automation	Browser Gateway Browser Automation
Summary	Playwright selector risk checks with healing suggestions and receipts.	AI browser tools with Chrome CDP. Navigate, screenshot, interact. Multi-provider failover.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwrightselectorguard-mcp": {
      "url": "https://playwrightselectorguard.clauxel.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "browser-gateway": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "browser-gateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons