Playwright Report MCP vs QualityMax QA MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Playwright Report MCP and QualityMax QA MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Playwright Report MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Playwright Report MCP Details

Choose QualityMax QA MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QualityMax QA MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Playwright Report MCP Browser Automation	QualityMax QA MCP Browser Automation
Summary	Run Playwright tests and surface structured results for AI agents doing test failure analysis.	Local QA MCP: scan URLs, inspect pages, generate Playwright repros, and run tests.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwright-report-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "playwright-report-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "qualitymax-qa-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@qualitymax/qmax-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons