Playwright Network Chaos MCP vs Selenium MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Playwright Network Chaos MCP and Selenium MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Playwright Network Chaos MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Playwright Network Chaos MCP Details

Choose Selenium MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Selenium MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Playwright Network Chaos MCP Browser Automation	Selenium MCP Browser Automation
Summary	MCP server that gives AI agents dynamic network chaos control over Playwright browser sessions	Selenium MCP server for AI agents — 38 browser automation tools with snapshots and sessions.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwright-network-chaos-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "playwright-network-chaos-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "selenium-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@gaforov/selenium-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons