Pinkpixel Dev Web Scout MCP vs Slivingdoc

In-depth architectural comparison of the Pinkpixel Dev Web Scout MCP and Slivingdoc MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Pinkpixel Dev Web Scout MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pinkpixel Dev Web Scout MCP Details

Choose Slivingdoc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Slivingdoc Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Pinkpixel Dev Web Scout MCP Developer Tools	Slivingdoc Developer Tools
Summary	Search the web and extract clean, readable text from webpages. Process multiple URLs at once to sp…	Share ordinary text files between concurrent agents without silently overwriting edits.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pinkpixel-dev-web-scout-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "slivingdoc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "slivingdoc",
        "serve",
        "--bucket",
        "my-notes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons