What is the key difference between Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter?

Physbound belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while KatanA Markdown Linter belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Physbound or KatanA Markdown Linter in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter free or paid?

Physbound operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). KatanA Markdown Linter operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Physbound lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. KatanA Markdown Linter lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Physbound or KatanA Markdown Linter in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter free to use, or do they require API keys?

Physbound is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . KatanA Markdown Linter operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both physbound and katana-markdown-linter as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Physbound has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. KatanA Markdown Linter holds a Quality Score of 39 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Physbound vs KatanA Markdown Linter

In-depth architectural comparison of the Physbound and KatanA Markdown Linter MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Physbound

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

KatanA Markdown Linter

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Physbound if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose KatanA Markdown Linter if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Physbound when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Physbound Details

Choose KatanA Markdown Linter when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore KatanA Markdown Linter Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Physbound Monitoring	K KatanA Markdown Linter Monitoring
Summary	Physical Layer Linter — validates RF link budgets, Shannon capacity, and noise floors.	Markdown linter and workspace-scoped stdio MCP server.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Physbound Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

KatanA Markdown Linter Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Physbound Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "physbound": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "physbound"
      ]
    }
  }
}

KatanA Markdown Linter Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "katana-markdown-linter": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "--yes"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Physbound is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, KatanA Markdown Linter belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select Physbound when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and KatanA Markdown Linter when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Physbound More alternatives to KatanA Markdown Linter Monitoring category hub Canonical compare URL