What is the key difference between Physbound and Statuscraft?

Physbound belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution, while Statuscraft belongs to the Monitoring category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Physbound or Statuscraft in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Physbound and Statuscraft free or paid?

Physbound operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Statuscraft operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Physbound lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. Statuscraft lists 5 tools with 1 views and 1 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Physbound and Statuscraft together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Physbound or Statuscraft in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Physbound and Statuscraft free to use, or do they require API keys?

Physbound is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Statuscraft operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Physbound and Statuscraft at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both physbound and jabbawocky-statuscraft as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Physbound has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. Statuscraft holds a Quality Score of 55 /100 ( Good ) with 1 views, 0 installs, and 1 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Physbound vs Statuscraft

In-depth architectural comparison of the Physbound and Statuscraft MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Physbound

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Statuscraft

Monitoring · Local stdio

Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Physbound if you need specialized Monitoring tools running via a local process. Choose Statuscraft if your workspace requires Monitoring integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Physbound when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Physbound Details

Choose Statuscraft when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Access normalized live status for 3355 major software services, Fetch structured incident details automatically for non-operational services, Cache status data with 60-second expiry and option to bypass cache.

Explore Statuscraft Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Physbound Monitoring	Statuscraft jabbawocky Monitoring
Summary	Physical Layer Linter — validates RF link budgets, Shannon capacity, and noise floors.	MCP server that checks the live status of 3831 software services in real time. Ask your AI agent "is GitHub down?" or "what's wrong with Sentry?" — and get a live answer pulled directly from official status pages, including full incident detail when something is broken. npx -y github:jabbawocky/statuscraft
Category & Scope	Monitoring

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Physbound Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Statuscraft Tools (5)

Access normalized live status for 3355 major software services

Fetch structured incident details automatically for non-operational services

Cache status data with 60-second expiry and option to bypass cache

Provide service metadata including IDs, tags, and categories

No API key required for installation and usage

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Physbound Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "physbound": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "physbound"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Statuscraft Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "jabbawocky-statuscraft": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Physbound is categorized under Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Statuscraft belongs to Monitoring using local stdio subprocess. Select Physbound when you need capabilities focused on monitoring and Statuscraft when you require tools for monitoring.

More alternatives to Physbound More alternatives to Statuscraft Monitoring category hub Canonical compare URL