Pgmcp vs NexQL Postgres MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Pgmcp and NexQL Postgres MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Pgmcp when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pgmcp Details

Choose NexQL Postgres MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query, dba, meta.

Explore NexQL Postgres MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Pgmcp Databases	NexQL Postgres MCP Databases
Summary	Read-only Postgres ops/DBA diagnostics: slow queries, EXPLAIN, locks, index and table health.	Standalone Postgres MCP server — schema-aware, read-only by default, installable everywhere.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pgmcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/conformance"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nexql-postgres-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "shim"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons