Perfume Picks vs Vikingdb MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Perfume Picks and Vikingdb MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Perfume Picks when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Perfume Picks Details

Choose Vikingdb MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (BYOK (Pay Provider Direct)).
• Primary tools included: Collection introduction, Index introduction, Information upserts.

Explore Vikingdb MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Perfume Picks Databases	Vikingdb MCP Server KashiwaByte Databases
Summary	Search the Perfume Picks fragrance database: 13,000+ scents with notes, dupes, and wear data.	VikingDB integration with collection and index introduction, vector store and search capabilities.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "perfume-picks": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "perfume-picks-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kashiwabyte-vikingdb-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons