Perfonext Build MCP vs Goreleaser MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Perfonext Build MCP and Goreleaser MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Perfonext Build MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Perfonext Build MCP Details

Choose Goreleaser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Goreleaser MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Perfonext Build MCP Developer Tools	Goreleaser MCP goreleaser Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Next.js build stats, chunk attribution, and bundle optimization advice.	GoReleaser MCP server for build automation
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "perfonext-build-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@perfonext/build-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-296": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-296"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons