Pentest MCP Server vs PabloLec Keyprobe MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Pentest MCP Server and PabloLec Keyprobe MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Pentest MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pentest MCP Server Details

Choose PabloLec Keyprobe MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PabloLec Keyprobe MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Pentest MCP Server Security	PabloLec Keyprobe MCP Security
Summary	Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.	Audit certificates and keystores to surface expiry risks, weak algorithms, and misconfigurations.…
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pentest-mcp-server": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/pentest-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pablolec-keyprobe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons