Pentest MCP Server vs Npm MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Pentest MCP Server and Npm MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Pentest MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pentest MCP Server Details

Choose Npm MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Npm MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Pentest MCP Server Security	Npm MCP Security
Summary	Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.	MCP server for npm package management, security analysis, and compatibility checking
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pentest-mcp-server": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/pentest-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "npm-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "commands"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons