Paxa Labs vs Gandr MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Paxa Labs and Gandr MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Paxa Labs when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: speak, queue_speech, control_playback.

Explore Paxa Labs Details

Choose Gandr MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: synthesize, list_voices, list_languages.

Explore Gandr MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Paxa Labs Developer Tools	Gandr MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Thai and English speech AI: text to speech with local playback, translation to Thai, and OCR	Text to speech in any MCP client. Six voices, watermarked, free key of 100,000 chars.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "paxa-labs": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@paxalabs/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gandr-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "gandr-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons