PastML vs PasteHTML

In-depth architectural comparison of the PastML and PasteHTML MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose PastML when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PastML Details

Choose PasteHTML when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PasteHTML Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P PastML Developer Tools	PasteHTML Developer Tools
Summary	Deploy HTML and Markdown as live URLs. Create, search, update, and manage pastes from any AI agent.	Publish, update, and organize HTML and Markdown pastes on PasteHTML as the authorized user.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pastml": {
      "url": "https://pastml.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pastehtml": {
      "url": "https://pastehtml.dev"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons