Passport.Me vs PipesHub

In-depth architectural comparison of the Passport.Me and PipesHub MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

P

Choose Passport.Me when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Passport.Me Details

Choose PipesHub when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PipesHub Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	P Passport.Me Communication	PipesHub Communication
Summary	Your Gmail, Calendar, Drive, GitHub, Oura, wallet and reviewed profile facts in any MCP client.	Permissioned search and cited answers over Slack, Drive, Gmail, Jira, and 50+ workplace sources.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "passport-me": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "passport-me"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeshub": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@pipeshub-ai/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons