Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Passive Aggression vs Yc Rejection
In-depth architectural comparison of the Passive Aggression and Yc Rejection MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Passive Aggression
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Yc Rejection
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Passive Aggression if you need specialized Social Media tools running via a local process. Choose Yc Rejection if your workspace requires Social Media integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Passive Aggression when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Y
Choose Yc Rejection when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Passive Aggression Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Yc Rejection Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Passive Aggression Configuration
Yc Rejection Configuration