Pasal.id — Indonesian Law vs Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
In-depth architectural comparison of the Pasal.id — Indonesian Law and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Pasal.id — Indonesian Law
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide
Legal · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 49/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Pasal.id — Indonesian Law if you need specialized Legal tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide if your workspace requires Legal integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Pasal.id — Indonesian Law when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Find regulations by Indonesian topic, keyword, or citation, with type, year, status, issuer, region, and within-law filters.
resolve_law
Resolve a title, citation, or abbreviation to a canonical `law_id`, or receive candidates when ambiguous.
get_law_context
Check a law's summary, structure, legal status, and amendment or court-review relationships before reading.
read_law
Read selected articles, multiple ranges, chapters, preambles, elucidation, or appendices using character budgets and continuation cursors.
search_court_decisions
Search **Mahkamah Konstitusi** decisions by topic, reviewed law, case lane, outcome, year, dissent, or judge.
report_issue
Submit a real data correction or failed-search report. This tool writes feedback; it is not a health probe.
ping
Check authenticated MCP liveness without a legal search or feedback submission.
Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide Tools (6)
search
Volltextsuche mit Lucene-Syntax. Filter nach Entscheiddatum, Scrape-Datum, Hierarchie (Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) und Sprache. Sortierung nach Relevanz, Entscheiddatum oder Scrape-Datum. Paginierung über `next_cursor` / `search_after`. Aggregationen für Facetten-Auswertung.
search_by_case_number
Exakte Phrasensuche nach Geschäftsnummern, Aktenzeichen und BGE-Zitaten (z.B. `BGE 142 III 1`, `6B_1234/2025`, `5A_396/2015`). Setzt die Nummer automatisch in Anführungszeichen.
fetch_document
Vollständigen Entscheid samt Volltext anhand der ID abrufen.
list_hierarchy
Hierarchie-IDs (Bund / Kanton / Gericht / Kammer) mit Trefferzahlen.
list_facets
Hierarchischer Facetten-Baum mit lokalisierten Labels in DE/FR/IT.
server_info
Versions- und Konfigurationsinformationen.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Pasal.id — Indonesian Law is categorized under Legal and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide belongs to Legal using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Pasal.id — Indonesian Law when you need capabilities focused on legal and Entscheidsuche — Schweizer Gerichtsentscheide when you require tools for legal.