Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Paris Events vs Barcelona Events
In-depth architectural comparison of the Paris Events and Barcelona Events MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Paris Events
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 23/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Barcelona Events
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 23/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Paris Events if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Barcelona Events if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
P
Choose Paris Events when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
B
Choose Barcelona Events when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Paris Events Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Barcelona Events Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Paris Events Configuration
Barcelona Events Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to Paris EventsMore alternatives to Barcelona EventsDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL