Parallel Browser MCP vs DrissionPage MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Parallel Browser MCP and DrissionPage MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Parallel Browser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Parallel Browser MCP Details

Choose DrissionPage MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore DrissionPage MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Parallel Browser MCP Developer Tools	DrissionPage MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for parallel browser automation across multiple providers.	Local browser automation for MCP clients powered by DrissionPage.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "parallel-browser-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "parallel-browser-mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "drissionpage-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "drissionpage-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons