Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) vs BrowserAI Dev
In-depth architectural comparison of the Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) and BrowserAI Dev MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex)
Research · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
BrowserAI Dev
Research · Local stdio
Quality: 64/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) if you need specialized Research tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose BrowserAI Dev if your workspace requires Research integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Research domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Paper search, arXiv full-text reading, and citation graphs over arXiv, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex.
Evidence-backed web research for AI agents. Real-time search with cited claims, confidence scores, and compare mode (raw LLM vs evidence-backed). MCP server, REST API, and Python SDK.
Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) is categorized under Research and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, BrowserAI Dev belongs to Research using local stdio subprocess. Select Paper Search (arXiv + Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex) when you need capabilities focused on research and BrowserAI Dev when you require tools for research.