Packkit vs SAT69 — Listas del SAT (69 y 69 B del CFF)

In-depth architectural comparison of the Packkit and SAT69 — Listas del SAT (69 y 69 B del CFF) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Packkit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Packkit Details

Choose SAT69 — Listas del SAT (69 y 69 B del CFF) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SAT69 — Listas del SAT (69 y 69 B del CFF) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Packkit Developer Tools	SAT69 — Listas del SAT (69 y 69 B del CFF) Developer Tools
Summary	Scaffold modern npm packages, CLIs, services and apps as a native tool for AI agents.	Verifica RFCs contra las listas del SAT (69/69-B CFF, EFOS): veredicto de riesgo fiscal.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "packkit-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "npx"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sat69-listas-del-sat-69-y-69-b-del-cff": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sat69-listas-del-sat-69-y-69-b-del-cff"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons