PabloLec Keyprobe MCP vs Troystack

In-depth architectural comparison of the PabloLec Keyprobe MCP and Troystack MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose PabloLec Keyprobe MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PabloLec Keyprobe MCP Details

Choose Troystack when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Troystack Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	PabloLec Keyprobe MCP Security	Troystack Security
Summary	Audit certificates and keystores to surface expiry risks, weak algorithms, and misconfigurations.…	Live precious metals prices, COMEX vault data, market intelligence, and calculators.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pablolec-keyprobe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "troystack": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "troystack"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons