Ovecc vs Visily

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ovecc and Visily MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ovecc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ovecc Details

V

Choose Visily when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_design_context, get_screenshot, get_board_theme.

Explore Visily Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ovecc Developer Tools	V Visily Developer Tools
Summary	Architecture guardrails for AI-written code: dependency graph, impact, dead code, CI gate	Use Visily designs in AI coding agents for code, discovery, and theme tokens.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ovecc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "ovecc"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "visily": {
      "url": "https://app.visily.ai/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons