Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Otto Intel vs Scrape402
In-depth architectural comparison of the Otto Intel and Scrape402 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Otto Intel
Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Scrape402
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Otto Intel if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Scrape402 if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
O
Choose Otto Intel when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Scrape402 when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Otto Intel Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Scrape402 Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Otto Intel Configuration
Scrape402 Configuration